Plan Your Financial Future in Minutes
Use our free SIP Calculator to estimate your investment returns, visualize compounding, and start building wealth today — no sign-up required.
Why Use Our SIP Calculator?
Simple Inputs
Just enter your monthly investment, time period, and expected return rate.
Visual Growth Charts
See how your wealth grows month by month with powerful visuals.
Customizable Results
Test different scenarios to find the perfect investment plan for you.
How I Turned ₹5,000/month into ₹6 Lakhs — My 3-Year SIP Journey
In 2020, I was saving ₹5,000/month with no real strategy. I stumbled into SIPs by chance. Today, that same habit has grown into ₹6,12,000 — and taught me 3 major lessons about compounding, patience, and mistakes I wish I avoided earlier.
📉 What Went Wrong in Year 1
In my first year, I panicked during a market dip and pulled out my SIP investments. That single move cost me potential gains and broke the compounding chain. I learned the hard way that reacting emotionally to market swings is a recipe for regret.
📈 Lesson Learned: Consistency Beats Timing
- Missed rallies by being out of the market
- Lost out on rupee cost averaging
- Peace of mind improved with automation and discipline
🔄 My Portfolio Before vs After
Before (2020)
- Random savings in bank account
- No real investment plan
- Low returns (2-3% p.a.)
After (2023)
- Disciplined SIPs in diverse mutual funds
- Portfolio value: ₹6,12,000
- Average returns: 13-15% p.a.
🧠 What I’d Do Differently If Starting Again
If I could start over, I’d set up my SIPs and forget about the daily market noise. I’d diversify a bit more, avoid panic-selling, and trust the process. Most importantly, I’d start even earlier — because time is your biggest ally in compounding.
MUMBAI :Gopika Gopakumar
gopika.g@livemint.com
mumbai
The Reserve Financial institution of India (RBI) on Wednesday tweaked guidelines governing investments in different funding funds (AIFs), providing some reduction for lenders pressured to make massive provisions, and traders instantly going through a drought of capital.
In December, RBI ordered banks and non-bank lenders to promote their investments in AIFs, which had additional invested in corporations to which the lenders had given loans within the earlier 12 months; in any other case, they needed to make 100% provisions towards them.
On Wednesday, the central financial institution clarified that lenders want to offer for under the quantity the AIF invested within the debtor firm, and never the whole quantity the lender invested within the AIF. RBI additionally stated its directive doesn’t cowl fairness shares of the debtor firm, however all different investments, together with hybrid devices.
Dipen Ruparelia, head of merchandise at Vivriti Asset Administration, stated that earlier, if a financial institution or a non-banking monetary firm (NBFC) had a ₹100 crore funding in an AIF, which additional makes a ₹50 crore funding in a debtor entity, then the lender needed to make a provision for the whole ₹100 crore; with the most recent tweak, the provisioning requirement will likely be solely ₹50 crore.
“This can be a welcome change to that impact,” Ruparelia stated.
The central financial institution’s December motion had come within the wake of issues that some lenders had been misusing the AIF route for evergreening loans, a observe the place lenders lengthen new loans to repay previous ones. Nonetheless, this pressured banks and NBFCs to make steep provisions, and tightened capital flows for AIFs. On 26 February, Mint reported that prime banks, together with State Financial institution of India, HDFC Financial institution and Axis Financial institution, had walked again on capital commitments to keep away from falling foul of guidelines.
RBI on Wednesday stated it has made the change after receiving representations from numerous stakeholders, and to make sure uniformity in implementation amongst regulated entities (REs).
Nonetheless, at the very least two trade executives had been sad in regards to the central financial institution protecting hybrid devices out of the purview of the relief.
In accordance with Siddharth Pai, govt council member of the PE/VC trade physique Indian Enterprise and Alternate Enterprise Capital Affiliation, whereas the adjustments present some operational and regulatory readability, in addition they elevate new questions.
“The exclusion of fairness shares from the definition of downstream investments works just for investments in listed corporations. It fails to account for personal fairness and enterprise capital investments, that are within the type of obligatory convertible devices reminiscent of CCPS and CCDs. The trade is debating as to whether or not they would want to transform all their hybrid secured to fairness to permit REs to remain invested of their funds,” stated Pai.
“Moreover, there’s nonetheless ambiguity as as to if current REs can nonetheless honour capital calls to AIFs who don’t meet the particular standards within the new round. The trade will attain out for additional readability on the matter,” he added.
Gopal Srinivasan, chairman of TVS Capital Funds stated the adjustments present a lift to fund of funds (FoFs), which can present extra consolation for the banks’ funding in AIFs.
“We’re additionally hoping that RBI will deal with obligatory convertible devices in accordance with Fema (Overseas Change Administration Act) definition and deal with them as fairness, which might then be excluded from these tips, as hybrid devices appear to be. Moreover, we count on all new funds sanctioned for AIFs from banks, in addition to drawdowns held up as a result of December round to undergo.”
RBI additionally excluded lenders investing in AIFs by way of intermediaries reminiscent of fund of funds or mutual funds.
Within the third quarter, 5 non-public banks made provisions price ₹2,334 crore towards their AIF portfolios, with HDFC Financial institution setting apart most of ₹1,220 crore, adopted by ICICI Financial institution with ₹627 crore. State Financial institution of India had made a provision of ₹240 crore towards its complete publicity of ₹1,000 crore.
Amongst non-banks, Piramal Enterprises had written down its total funding in AIFs, leading to a consolidated lack of ₹2,377.59 crore.
Specialists consider the whole provisioning made by these entities might not be reversed as a few of them are within the type of hybrid securities. Nonetheless, the provisioning burden will cut back to the extent of their funding.
Unlock a world of Advantages! From insightful newsletters to real-time inventory monitoring, breaking information and a personalised newsfeed – it is all right here, only a click on away! Login Now!
#RBI #relaxes #guidelines #lenders #funding #AIFs